|
"In Fantastic Company":
What makes us human? In the exhibition Blick aufs
Ich / The View upon the Ego in the Neues Museum Weserburg in Bremen,
artistic portrayals of human beings from the 20th century will be on show
until June 15.
Bremen in the spring of 2003: with eighty drawings,
paintings, sculptures, and photographs from the collection of the
Deutsche Bank, the exhibition Blick aufs Ich documents the
ever-changing human image from modernism up to the present day. The
broad spectrum of artistic positions introduced in the rooms of the
Neues Museum Weserburg Bremen provides an insight into an era that, more
than any other before it, has been marked both by collective visions and
the struggle for individual self-determination. As one of the thematic
exhibitions of Deutsche Bank's collection, Blick aufs Ich
concentrates on the artistic reinvention of the human being in the 20th
century as well as on the cultural transformations reflected in its
various images.

Otto Dix, Großstadt (Entwurf zu Großstadttriptychon), 1926
© VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn 2002
Ranging from
representatives of German Expressionism, such as Ludwig Ernst Kirchner
or Max Beckmann - who called for a return to original, existential
values in their formal allegiance to the Primitive - to the cards with
superstars' autographs that the American Richard Prince reproduces as
cool relics of a media age under the slogan "all the best":
  
Richard Prince, Courtney Love, Fred Savage, Keanu Reeves (all the best), 2000
© Galerie Jablonka, Köln
the artistic
upheavals that Blick aufs Ich marks over the course of a century
make the ambiguity embodied in every human likeness clear. No matter how
much we try to find and articulate the common in ever newer inventions
of ourselves, it appears all the more questionable whether this attempt
can ever really bring forth a valid definition of the human.
|
Chris Ofili, Untitled, 2000
Deutsche Bank Collection
|
Chris Ofili, Untitled, 2000
Deutsche Bank Collection
|
Whereas the concentric model of the atom was the symbol
of progress for the 20th century, largely determined as it was by
mechanization, the symbol of the network has assumed its place in the
digital age, in which a clear center can no longer be located. The
search for identity-generating values in culture, business, and
politics, for an authentic "center" to a human being situated within the
society surrounding him is evidently more than ever accompanied by
insecurity in view of the effects of globalization.
Although
communication and trade have increasingly shifted to the virtual realm,
rendering a connection to fixed locations, time zones, and personal
encounters more and more superfluous, the concept of individual and
cultural identity is undergoing a process of constant change, as well.
If David Bowie, in the pop circus of the seventies, resembled a
chameleon-like, fictitious figure that was able to slip into another
identity with each external transformation, nowadays everyone is called
upon to reinvent himself each and every day.
In view of the possibilities of digital, surgical, and genetic manipulation,
as well as an inexhaustible flood of media imagery, the human being of
the new millennium declares himself to be malleable material.

Franz West, Studie, 1999 ©Atelier
Franz West, Wien
|
Katharina Sieverding, Transformer, 1973
© VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn 2002
Whereas in the
early seventies the staged, androgynous self-portrayals of artists such
as Katharina Sieverding or
Jürgen Klauke departed subversively from prevailing role models,
bio-technological innovations today determine the parameters of social
and individual change. It is no longer the subversive experiment that
counts, but a longing for bodily perfection and an absolute degree of
self-control.
The modern human being somewhere between dream and
nightmare: a "chameleon-like being with Sisyphean traits" is what Veit
Loers called the artistic human image of the 20th century in his
catalogue essay on the exhibition (catalogue
here). A view into the collecting history of the Deutsche Bank presents
the challenge of juxtaposition - for the formal representation of the
human figure is intertwined with references to personal and social
existence: "Despite my experience, I am still idiotic enough to believe
that human beings continue to exist," said
Elfriede Lohse-Wächtler,

Elfriede Lohse-Wächtler,
Selbstportrait (in fantastischer Gesellschaft), 1931
© Förderkreis Elfriede Lohse-Wächtler, Hamburg
the painter from Dresden who, as an inmate of a Saxon sanatorium, was murdered
in 1940 in the sanatorium's gas chamber following a compulsory
sterilization (an essay on Lohse Wächtler and George Grosz can be found
here). In her Self-Portrait (in Fantastic Company) of 1931, the
fears and doubts of an era characterized by inner and outer emigration
become manifest. Nonetheless, Wächtler's averted gaze is the look of a
rebel who radically went far beyond the traditional image of the woman
and artist of her time, trading in her protected bourgeois existence for
the rough life in Hamburg's red-light district. Following the National
Socialist takeover, the artist paid for her rebellion with her life.
(More about Elfriede Lohse-Wächtler
here and
here)
Although entire worlds seem to lie between the end of the
Weimar Republic and New York's East Village of the eighties, we
encounter a similarly "fantastic company" at close hand in
Blick aufs Ich for instance in Nan Goldin's portrait of April in
the Windows,

Nan Goldin, April in the window, 1983
© Nan Goldin, New York
taken in 1983 in the
back room of a New York club. Goldin's photographs of friends,
outsiders, scene denizens, drag queens, and junkies, whom she
accompanied with her camera for decades, made her famous all around the
world. How difficult this path at times proved to be is something Goldin
talks about in an
interview she gave to the Harvard Advocate in 1999: at the end of a
five-month drug and alcohol withdrawal in a Boston clinic, Goldin was
supposed to look for a job; although she had already published her book
The Ballad of Sexual Dependency, the clinic did not consider art to be
a profession. Thus it came about that the photographer was framing
slides in the basement of a university library while her work was being
lectured on a floor above.

Tim Stoner, Rebirth, 2001 © The Approach Gallery, London Sammlung
Deutsche Bank
Just as references arise here
among the most varied works and biographies, Blick aufs Ich
offers, in the truest sense of the word, a stimulus to search out
"company."
Encountering the show’s various human likenesses, we may,
perhaps, not only stumble over things that seem somewhat foreign to us,
but also the horrors of our own clichés and prejudiced models of
thinking, as is demonstrated in the watercolors by the young British
artist Tim Stoner, which carry ironic and programmatic titles such as
Rebirth (2001) or Study for Highlife (2000). The apparently idyllic
impression of wealth and civilization is deceptive: a young couple is
stepping out of a public swimming pool, a twosomeness barely alluded to
by the contours of their silhouettes. The rebirth occurs in the process
of making the image anonymous. Devoid of expression, a man busy
telephoning looks back at us: the shadow concealing his face to the
point of unrecognizability seems like a projective surface for the hopes
and fears of the new century.
|
Tim Stoner, Study for Highlife, 2000
© The Approach Gallery, London Sammlung Deutsche Bank
|
Tim Stoner, Birthday Party, 1998 ©
The Approach Gallery, London Sammlung Deutsche Bank
|
Oliver Koerner von Gustorf
|