|
At the Center of the Periphery: The
legendary flat files of Williamsburg’s Pierogi Gallery
Some of the young artists represented in the New York collection also show in
Williamsburg’s Pierogi Gallery, which is held in high esteem by artists,
curators, and collectors alike: Harald Fricke on the lively art
scene in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, and on Pierogi’s legendary flat files,
which encompass works on paper by nearly 700 artists.
At
first, art was a window to the world, then it was expected to open up
more to reality, and finally it was supposed to correspond to life
completely. This is a frequently cited idealization that stands in stark
contrast to another idealized image, namely that of the artist toiling
away in his studio in front of the model, striving to create an original
work of art on the canvas. For artists, a problem arises that proves to
be difficult to solve: because their working lives take place to a large
extent inside the studio, they are allegedly incapable of saying all
that much about the reality of the world outside their own four walls.

Don Doe, Easel Piles, 1998, Collection Deutsche Bank
The painter
Don Doe came up with a bafflingly simple solution to this problem: his
watercolors, some of which are part of the New York collection of the
Deutsche Bank, are about nothing more than the production of art. Again
and again, Doe portrays the ironically idealized everyday life of the
artist: in his work Treaty, for instance (1998), he alludes to
concrete situations between the painter and model; in Double Decaff
(1998), he addresses the struggle for inspiration, while in Easel Piles
(1998) his attention is turned to the mute lament of the empty canvas.
All these images are allegories of the artist’s own personal view of the
world, in which art at best opens a window onto art. Doe knows, of
course, how absurd this project is, and that’s why the confined
pictorial spaces in which his home stories take place come across as
ironic references to the conceptually austere structure underlying these
works. In his current exhibition Echo and Narcissus in the young
New York gallery Apartment 5BE, Doe comes out of the closet as a pin-up
fan and enthusiast of trivial erotica. At the same time, he deliberately
and in all seriousness harks back to art historical models such as the
taut physiognomies of
Edward Hopper’s figures or the cool, distanced perspectives of film
noir realism, and even
Raymond Pettibon’s jagged comic-like contour can be found in some of
the works. Doe is concerned in maintaining a balance in which humorous
commentary and the artistically self-referential, narcissism and
melancholy are not locked into competition with one another, but remain
in a state of suspension. This is how he succeeds in doing justice to a
state in which the separation between art and life is not annulled, but
at least momentarily blurred.
|
|
Don Doe, Echo and Narcissus, 2003,
Courtesy of Apartment 5BE, New York
|
Don Doe, Double Decaff, 1998,
Collection Deutsche Bank
|
Doe’s position is obstinate, yet it strives to remain open to the
viewer: a patchwork that feeds on private experience without neglecting
the conflicts between art and society. Doe shares this strategy with a
number of other artists represented in the collection of the Deutsche
Bank New York:
Nina Bovasso,
Tom Burckhardt,
Ken Butler, Marc
Dean Veca,
Tim Maul, or
Charles Spurrier, for instance. Many artists of the younger generation try
to maintain a position at the periphery while aiming for the center at
the same time – on the New York art scene, this is the fine line that
has been separating pop appeal from mainstream since the sixties.
Throughout the process, this shift in definition has also occurred
within the city itself, the art scene having left the fashionable SoHo
lofts in the nineties in favor of the Chelsea warehouses, which are
better able to accommodate the development towards large-scale
installation. And another change has already been taking place for a
number of years on the opposite bank of the East River in Williamsburg,
Brooklyn, with its two-story houses that still housed dock workers a
hundred years ago.

Joe Amrhein mit Hund Berry vor Pierogi.
Bob & Roberta Smith, The Art Amnesty,
(Installations-Ansicht), Courtesy of Pierogi, New York
The
return to the intimacy of drawing and the general limitation of artistic
means fit well with this almost small-town atmosphere, which is so
markedly different from the heyday of the East Village and Alphabet City
and yet so reminiscent of the process of gentrification that gave rise
to both. It’s not the grand gesture that’s called for here, but rather
clear and concise descriptions of the present. It comes as no surprise
that Williamsburg recalls the feeling of the Beat generation. Only the
sounds have changed: instead of Bob Dylan’s
Subterranean Homesick Blues, it’s static and electronics, while jagged
ambient sounds replace the old protest songs.

Die Pierogi-Flatfiles
The gallery in which all these various
projects converge is called
Pierogi and is run by
Joe Amrhein. The name, borrowed from the small dumpling typical of the
local cuisine, pays homage to the community of Polish immigrants in the
area. Today, Amrhein is concerned with the survival of another community
– the many artists who live in Williamsburg whom “the Manhattan
galleries take no notice of,” as Amrhein says. In response to this, the
gallery Pierogi 2000 was opened in 1994 (the number 2000 was omitted
from the name upon the arrival of the new millennium). Only one year
later, the
flat files were born, and with them an unusual form of presentation:
since then, Pierogi’s main focus has been to archive and display works
on paper and photographs in metal flat files; over the course of time,
the collection has grown to encompass nearly 700 artists. Parallel to
the ongoing exhibitions in the gallery space, Pierogi offers its
visitors an ever-growing arsenal of young contemporary art. Whoever
wishes to can pore through the individual portfolios arranged in the
drawers to research a specific artist or simply to embark on a personal
journey of discovery.
|
Mark Dean Veca no title, 1996
Collection Deutsche Bank
|
Mark Dean Veca no title, 1996
Collection Deutsche Bank
|
The magic word for this strategy is “Access for all,” or, as Amrhein
explains, “we were concerned from the very beginning in representing the
community. This is always an organic process throughout which the
artists can change. At the center, however, is the individual work, and
the flat files transform its accessibility into a haptic experience.”
Had it been otherwise, the initiative would have remained a mere service, a
list of links for the internet. But it’s precisely the flat files’
highly compact physical accessibility that has made Pierogi famous well
beyond Williamsburg. At first, there were enthusiastic reviews in the
New York press – one critic even spoke of the index of artists as the
conceptual “art work” of the year – and then the exhibition went on
tour. The flat files have traveled as far as London and Vienna, and the
gallery recently occupied a fair booth at Berlin’s art forum, with a
selection of Pierogi portfolios.
The collection’s growth,
however, has also brought Amrhein close to his own limitations. As a
non-profit gallery, he isn’t in a position to employ assistants to keep
the vast number of portfolios up to date on an ongoing basis or to look
after the conservation and care of the drawings. “It’s a typical New
York dilemma,” according to Amrhein, “that so much is done for the
city’s museums – we also have a good number of collections here. But
there’s no support for the artists who actually live in this city, and
yet they’re the ones who form the basis for New York’s reputation as an
art metropolis. That’s why we’ll continue doing what we do, of course,
even if we, as a gallery, receive no support. But I’ll have to think
about whether we need to come up with a new concept. At first, the files
will be continued according to a rotating principle, which means that
older works have to be taken out to accommodate new artists. That wasn’t
the original intention when we began, but artists have already begun
getting in touch with us from abroad who want to be part of the list,
and so I have to act – and select.”
|
|
Charles Spurrier no title, 1997
Collection Deutsche Bank
|
Charles Spurrier no title, 1997
Collection Deutsche Bank
|
In spite of its enormous expansion, Pierogi can’t even count on a larger
economic profit to alleviate some of the organizational work. The first
rule of sale prevents this: no work of art is allowed to cost more than
two thousand dollars, and most of them go for less than two hundred
dollars, because Amrhein also wants “people who otherwise wouldn’t go
into a commercial gallery to become interested in art without being put
under the pressure of a selling situation, as is usually the case in
Chelsea or SoHo.”
This is why Liz Christensen, who takes
care of the art of Deutsche Bank in New York, is also interested in
Pierogi’s artists: “We take care to maintain our collection at the most
current level possible. Especially recently, the production of art has
been moving in a direction where artists are making smaller, more
intimate formats again. You need considerably more time to investigate
positions like that. That’s one advantage that Pierogi has. Secondly,
the low prices are an incentive to expand the collection without taking
an enormous financial risk. It’s incredible, but there are original
pieces at Pierogi that can be had for less money than some fancy posters
cost.”
Tom Burckhardt no title, 1997,
Collection Deutsche Bank
|
Tom Burckhardt no title, 1997
|
One of the artists Christensen discovered at Pierogi is
Tom Burckhardt. More than anything else, Christensen was interested in his
series of painted book pages: “Burckhardt’s drawings reflect both an
enthusiasm for Indian miniature painting and an involvement with other
cultures, as well. Some of the forms he uses remind me of older
Ukrainian textile designs.” Along with influences such as these,
Burckhardt’s diagrammatic drawings can also be compared with those of
Tim Rollins, who worked on collective graffiti works in New York
throughout the eighties together with the Bronx-based group K.O.S. –
Kids of Survival.
Back then, Rollins and K.O.S. were concerned
with transferring Kafka texts into a hip-hop context in order to bring
high and low culture into a dynamic relationship with one another.
Twenty years later, in Tom Burckhardt’s work, several widely divergent
cultural threads overlap – the state of art in global circumstances. The
artist Ken Butler, on the other hand, focuses his attention on musical
instruments, which he constructs from an array of everyday objects. His
drawings take on the character of assembling instructions, but they also
combine concrete design with utopian ideas of a “bastardized culture”
already manifested in contemporary music, with its models of ethnic
identity available at will via sampling, loop, and quote. Just as pop
music can blend Arabic folklore with electronic beats, so too are
Butler’s drawings a game with technology and its continuous development,
in which the question as to the original no longer plays an important
role.

Nina Bovasso, no title, 1996 ©Clementine Gallery, New York
Collection Deutsche Bank
The sketches
Charles Spurrier makes for his paintings mislead us in a similar way. The
textures that branch out in his paper works derive from his own
thumbprint, which he collages together with ever-changing patterns. For
Christensen, the attraction in
Nina Bovasso’s work also lies in this “sophisticated doodling,”
which wanders over the paper surface like an ornament. Here, the image
of the world is suddenly very close – as a perpetual chaos.
This is where the circle goes full round; already back in the sixties,
there was a movement that reflected constant change – it didn’t matter
if it occurred in life, in art, or on the street: in taking a look back
at Fluxus, New York has perhaps arrived at the forefront once again.
Harald Fricke is art critic for the German newspaper "Die Tageszeitung" and
writes for artmagazines like "artforum".
Translation: Andrea Scrima
|